The TITAN American Business Awards upholds the highest standards of fairness, professionalism, and impartiality in its judging process. Each year, a panel of accomplished business professionals, executives, entrepreneurs, and industry experts is appointed, bringing expertise across sectors including marketing, corporate leadership, technology, human resources, and customer experience.
Judges are carefully selected through a structured process to ensure credibility, diversity, and real-world insight. Each jury plays a vital role in ensuring entries are evaluated through a fair and objective review system.
Selection Criteria
- Proven Business Experience
Judges must demonstrate substantial professional experience, with a strong background in executive leadership, entrepreneurship, strategic operations, or business development. Applicants should have a clear track record of contributing to industry growth or organizational success.
- Verified Qualifications
Professional credentials, career achievements, and organizational impact are key considerations during the selection process. A record of business excellence is essential.
- Ethical Standards & Objectivity
All judges must agree to impartiality and disclose any potential conflicts of interest. Jurors are prohibited from evaluating entries in which they or their companies are directly involved.
- Confidentiality Commitment
To preserve the integrity of the award, all entries are evaluated under strict confidentiality. Content shared in submissions may not be used, distributed, or discussed outside the judging process.
- Blind Judging Protocol
Submissions are reviewed independently and anonymously, based on defined judging criteria. Scores are averaged to determine final results without influence or bias.
- Diversity of Perspective
The panel reflects a range of industries, disciplines, and professional backgrounds. We value balanced judgment informed by different sectors and experiences.
- Professional Verification
All selected jurors must provide:
- A valid professional or business email address (no personal domains)
- A publicly accessible professional profile (e.g., LinkedIn)
- Confirmation of active employment or current business affiliation
Judge Expectations
- Voluntary and Non-Commercial Role
Judging for the TITAN American Business Awards is a voluntary, non-compensated position. The program does not work with agents, consultants, or third parties during the selection process. No individual or organization can influence or guarantee an appointment to the jury.
- Evaluation Commitment
Selected judges are expected to complete a minimum of 50 assigned evaluations to qualify for official recognition, including an e-Certificate and continuous public listing on the TITAN website.
- Professional Review Standards
Jurors must dedicate adequate time and attention to thoroughly review each submission, providing fair, thoughtful, and criteria-based evaluations in line with the standards of business excellence.
- Public Recognition of Jurors
Confirmed jury members will be featured on the official website with their name, title, and professional affiliation. This public listing supports transparency and honors the contributions of participating professionals.
- Ongoing Feedback & Collaboration
Judges are encouraged to share feedback on the process, helping to refine future jury procedures and maintain the credibility of the TITAN Awards as a respected platform for business recognition in the U.S.